Christians 'denied right to wear cross'
Christians 'denied right to wear  cross', Ministers deny right to wear cross, The government has been  attacked for arguing Christians don't have a right to wear a cross at  work. The Archbishop of York has attacked the government for denying  that Christians have a right to wear the cross at work. Dr John Sentamu  hit out at "meddling" after it emerged that ministers were fighting a  case brought by two women at the European Court of Human Rights.
The pair, Nadia Eweida and  Shirley Chaplin, claim that they were discriminated against when their  employers barred them from wearing the symbol.
Mrs Eweida's case dates from  2006 when she was suspended by British Airways for breaching BA's  uniform code; Mrs Chaplin was barred from working on wards by Royal  Devon and Exeter NHS Trust after refusing to hide the cross she wore on a  necklace chain.
Lawyers for the two women claim  that the protection under Article Nine of the Human Rights Act for  "manifesting" religion covers things that are not a "requirement of the  faith".
But according to the Sunday  Telegraph, the government's submission to the Strasbourg court dismisses  their argument as "ill-founded".
"The Government submit that...  the applicants' wearing of a visible cross or crucifix was not a  manifestation of their religion or belief within the meaning of Article  9, and... the restriction on the applicants' wearing of a visible cross  or crucifix was not an 'interference' with their rights protected by  Article 9."
The response, prepared by the  Foreign Office, adds: "In neither case is there any suggestion that the  wearing of a visible cross or crucifix was a generally recognised form  of practising the Christian faith, still less one that is regarded  (including by the applicants themselves) as a requirement of the faith."
Speaking on the BBC's Andrew  Marr show, Dr Sentamu said: "My view is that this is not the business of  government actually. They are beginning to meddle in areas that they  ought not to. I think they should leave that to the courts to make a  judgment.
"If someone wanted to manifest  their belief as a Christian that they wanted to wear a cross - after all  at their baptism they are sealed with a cross of Christ - so if they  decided to say 'I know I am sealed with it, but I am going to wear it', I  think that is a matter really for people and that we should allow it.  The government should not raise the bar so high that in the end they are  now being unjust."
via: yahoo
